Friday, December 4, 2009

Smugmug and Search engine optimization (SEO) - I give up

Google do have a lot of help pages for webmasters. Here is the one for images: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=114016
Give your images detailed, informative filenames


The filename can give Google clues about the subject matter of the image. Try to make your filename a good description of the subject matter of the image. For example, my-new-black-kitten.jpg is a lot more informative than IMG00023.JPG. Descriptive filenames can also be useful to users: If we're unable to find suitable text in the page on which we found the image, we'll use the filename as the image's snippet in our search results.

Before Smugmug made the changes with filenames the filenames looked like this: 24815903-1qRs4-L-1.jpg.

After the "We have made it so filenames get seen and indexed by Google" the filenames looks like this: 24815903-1qRs4-L-1.jpg.


No change at all to filenames.

I can not see anywhere on http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/ that foldernames will help image search.


I will suggest Smugmug to reopen the "allow images to be found in google image search" and make it right this time.

Just changing the filenames not going to help much: On the same page they also suggest:


  • Create great alt text
  •  Anchor text
  • Create a great user experience
  •     standalone landing page for each image
  •     putting your images high up on the page
  •     structuring your directories so that similar images are saved together
And most importantly Follow Goggle's usual webmaster guidelines.

(The usual stuff: Sitemap, Quality content, avoid duplicate content and much more - most of which Smugmug is not following)

  Some Smugmug users have named their images right for years - It doesn't help at all. (like some of the fotographers with photos on the all-time most popular Smugmug photos)


Personally I don't care about this anymore - I have already given up. I an just frustrated on behalf of all Smugmug users that are frustrated of the poor Smugmug SEO performance. This thread could take years and be as long as "How To Maximize Your Findability" without going nowhere.


Smugmug need to change their attitude to recommendations from Google.

I doubt they will.


Once I was dedicated Smugmug fan - not any more.


3 comments:

Sheaf said...

Allan, I'm not sure you understand the difficulties of handling filenames on a photo sharing site used by tens of thousands of photographers and with numerous privacy and security controls. There have to be identifying numbers and hashes. There is no other choice.

Regardless, Google takes the entire filename into account, not just the last bit. Our new filenames look like this: sheaf.smugmug.com/History/Ancient/nicefilename/CutestDog/731798572_L6Ykm-S.jpg . It has plenty of Google juice, including the user defined category nicename, subcategory nicename, gallery nicename, and the original filename. And it is leaps and bounds beyond any other photo sharing site out there.

Unknown said...

HI Sheaf,
I'm sure it is difficult to handle filenames on a large photo hosting site, but I'm just referring to the SEO recommandations from Google.
What recommandations are you referring to?

Unknown said...

Nice post
I want to say thank's for the time you took in writing this post for samsung and search engine optimization. your blog is an inspiration for me...thanks
SEO India

Post a Comment